Again, it begs the question, why supplement with Trenbolone-Enanthate over other Tren forms? The only reason one would choose the Enanthate version over any other Tren form is based on injection frequency. If you supplement with Trenbolone-Acetate, you're going to have to inject on an every other day basis. Some will even inject on a daily basis due to the short half-life, but every other day is more than sufficient. If you supplement with Parabolan, you're going to find a 2-3 times per week schedule to be warranted, with 3 times per week being optimal. However, Parabolan is extremely expensive, the original is no longer made, and this form is commonly counterfeited and simply not as available as the Acetate version. At any rate, if you choose Trenbolone-Enanthate you'll be able to limit yourself to two injections per week. In truth, you might be able to get by with one injection every five days, but two times per week will be optimal. In any case, there is truly no true advantage over this version of Tren in-terms of direct performance, and anyone who claims there is has suffered from some placebo type effect, or simply doesn't know what they're talking about.
Dave, let me clear the air here on some of the confusion… I recommend the 1 vial cycle for someone who is either A. younger or either B. already has high levels of natural testosterone. Now, the typical middle aged male who already had declining levels of natural testosterone COULD go with 500 mg/wk for 10 wks. Recovery is recovery at that point and if you’re going to do it then I see nothing wrong with getting the most out of that first cycle. But what you have to realize is a male with a starting level of high average test levels can still yield the same benefits of someone who is middle range-low end of normal and uses 500mg/wk of test. In either case the person can still gain a solid 20 lbs of muscle from either 1 or 2 vials, the determining factor on this is what they were at to begin with